Friday, March 09, 2007

晃晃聯結~

今天看到【過去現在未來】裡面的意見,
赫然發現,原來聯結真的不是給自己看的!

但,在這裡真的很想打個小廣告,
【過】版版主在資訊管理上面超超強,
各種跟電腦、網絡有關的疑難雜症,
在【過】版上應該都可以得到解答!

試試看,你就知道了!

另外一個推薦的版呢,
是【美食專區】,
常常會貼一些新加坡食物。
不過,能看不能吃,
要不要讓自己引起這樣的情緒?
各位看倌自行決定啦~

3 comments:

sappheiros said...

張老大 您發現的還真快
資管剛好是我本科 並沒有多厲害好不好
真正厲害的是網路 資料都是靠網路找來的

連結應該還是可以算是給自己看的啦!
只是看到大家會好奇所以點一下吧!

小鱼吾智宣 said...

关于网络上的连接,嗯,在此提供一个有关版权法令的小帖士?

Since accession to WTO(世贸)in 2001, yours is a member state of the WIPO Convention, an international agreement on IP(知识产权)laws, including copyright. Member states have obligations to abide by what's set out in the Convention. Under your copyright law (perhaps likened with that of the US on the concept of "fair use") where the use of materials on the internet is concerned, not only downloading of materials have to be treated with caution, the linking to other websites, including web logs ("blogs") is also one area to mind. Permission would have to be sought and granted when providing links from one website to another.

Deep-linking is another issue, which occurs when in the process of linking, you by-pass the homepage and go straight to the web-page or document youwant. Here, it may not so much for linking to one another's blogs, but linking from blogs to other websites (such as other websites which you find very useful, commercial or not). Deep-linking is treated differently in the various jurisdictions. The general rule is that if you need to provide links to the pages of another website, other than the homepage, permission would have to be sought.

Just my two-cents-worth. Christians in the legal-related professions know very well that in all matters of our faith, especially in the Christian circle, we will not be bound by legalism - coz we're after the spirit of the law, not the letter of the law. However, there's such balance as to giving to Caesar what's Caesar's, while to God what's God's, amen? :o)

Chris said...

親愛的蔚藍,我何時也變成老大了?